Hello, friends.* Some Ryder Cup thoughts…
(*Let’s all be thankful NBC carries the Ryder Cup and not CBS - Jim Nantz would wrap himself in an American flag and cry like Tammie Fay – at the opening ceremonies.)
Underdog vs. Favorite
There are countless writers and pundits and commentators who are predicting victory for the US side. As underdogs for the first time. This humors me. Regarding the labels “favorite” and “underdog,” I feel the need to channel the Princess Bride’s Inigo Montoya, whose comments on the word “inconceivable” are apt.

You keep using these words (underdog/favorite). I do not think these words mean what you think they mean.
Was the US really the favorite in 2006 after losing in ‘02 and getting absolutely hammered on home turf in ‘04? We’ve lost five of six and the lone victory in that span was the result of the greatest comeback in the history of the competition – and the worst display of sportsmanship. We’ve been the underdogs for years now. And we’ve been losing to back that up.
The Tiger Situation

First and foremost, the biggets pisser about no Tiger is no Elin. I’ll pour out some baby milk for you, E.
As far as the competition is concerned, Tiger’s absence doesn’t make us more crafty – more European, if you will. It makes our team worse. Would you rather have Tiger Woods or Boo Weekely, the last points qualifier, on the team? If the other players were intimidated by Tiger, are they going to find comfort in Boo? I don’t mean to bag on Boo. He’s been on better form than all but a couple players on the team. Which leads to…
Phil Mickelson, your fearless leader?

It’s pretty well established a decent percentage of the guys on Tour think Mickelson is full of shit. And he tends to prove them right. The Ryder Cup is rarely, if ever about pulling off the miracle shots. It’s about making important putts – and not hitting terrible shots. On top of that, he’s been off form the past few months. Only a couple top tens – and no victories since he pulled off the (you guessed it) miraculous shot at Colonial in May. Bottom line, guys aren’t going to rally around Phil. There’s a better chance it could happen with Furyk (whose wife had to go to the hospital today for a bulging disk) or maybe Perry. On the other side, even without Darren Clarke, the Europeans will rally around each other without even trying. If there are personal issues between players, they go out the window the next three days. I promise at some point you’ll see Paddy and Sergio making out. And Paddy has screwed Sergio out of two of the past six majors. Though I think Sergio put more of the blame on God for the ‘07 Open Championship.
The Scrap Factor (made famous by Chris DiMarco)

Let me decode the scrap factor for you: If a guy is short in stature and isn’t very long and isn’t very straight and tends to make a more than his share of putts and, most importantly, pumps his fist when he makes said putts (regardless of whether it’s a practice round or the actual tournament), he is labeled a bulldog and adds to the teams’ scrap factor. What an absolute load of horse shit. You know why DiMarco might be better at match play or team golf? Because he doesn’t have to count all his shots. People are trying to stuff JB “The Troll” Holmes into this role. But the guy is as bland as a pair of Kenny Perry’s pleated Dockers. Just because he hits it a ton doesn’t make him a wild man, either. Not to mention, his length and his inability to make putts (when you see a man under 35 using a belly or long putter, you’ve got a bad putter – I promise) make him a poor fit for this team’s leading scrapper. I will concede that his appearance is shocking – a good trait for a scrapper to have. Seems to be a mix of Rory Sabbatini and Alfalfa. I worry, though, he’ll come across a bridge during the competition and decide to stay under it. Jerry Kelly, where are you?
The Stinkers
For the US: Ben Curtis, Boo Weekely, Hunter Mahan, Chad Campbell, Holmes
For the Euros: Oliver Wilson
This reminds me of an old Barry Switzer quote. When informed that his upcoming opponent was allegedly spying on his practices, Switzer said,
“Shit, give ‘em the playbook. We’re gonna beat ‘em because we have better players than they do.”
I know this logic never worked for the Americans. But these quality Europeans, for the most part, have also proven themselves from a team play/match play perspective.
The Truth

The logic behind picking the US this time, I can only imagine, is that nothing else has worked, so maybe we can beat them with worse players on a shitty golf course. Though the shitty golf course theory might have some merit, it’s not shitty enough to make the difference. They’ve beaten us on American style courses before and they’ll do it again.
For the first time this century the Europeans have more individual talent than the Americans. Couple that with their proven ability to play better team golf and they might as well call off the singles on Sunday.




























